Current:Home > MarketsSocial Security's most important number for retirement may not be what you think it is-LoTradeCoin
Social Security's most important number for retirement may not be what you think it is
View Date:2024-12-24 01:09:25
Preparing for retirement usually means answering a lot of questions. How much will I need saved? What will my expenses look like? What kind of lifestyle am I hoping to enjoy?
There are plenty of factors that vary from person to person, but one of the most pressing for many people is when they're going to claim Social Security benefits.
If you're blessed to have a nice retirement nest egg, Social Security will be a nice-to-have supplemental retirement income source. For most Americans, though, this isn't the case. Social Security plays a major role in many people's finances during retirement, so the timing of one's claim is a huge decision.
There are many numbers you're expected to know regarding Social Security -- from full retirement age to wage base limits and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) -- but one of the most important numbers is 82 ½, because it can be a key part in helping you decide when to claim benefits.
It all starts with your full retirement age
Your full retirement age (FRA) is significant because it tells you when you're eligible to receive your full Social Security benefit. Using the benefit amount you're entitled to at full retirement age, Social Security calculates any adjustments to your monthly check when you decide to claim before or after FRA.
You can claim benefits as early as 62, but your monthly payout will be reduced based on how many months away your full retirement age is. For example, someone whose full retirement age is 67 would have their monthly benefit reduced by 20% if they claim at 64 and 30% if they claim at 62.
On the other hand, you can delay benefits past your full retirement age, increasing them by two-thirds of 1% each month, or 8% annually.
It's bigger than just the monthly benefit
The thought of increased monthly benefits is appealing but may not be worth it. As an example, let's use someone whose full retirement age is 67 and who has a monthly benefit of $1,900 (the estimated monthly average for retired workers in Jan. 2024 is $1,907). If they delay benefits until 70, they can expect a 24% increase to their monthly payout, bringing it to $2,356.
Based on a potential claim at 67 or 70 with those numbers, here's how much this person would collect in total by different ages:
Calculations by the author.
Even with the increased benefit, someone claiming at age 70 would collect less in cumulative benefits by age 80 than if they claim at 67. By age 85, it flips, and claiming at 70 results in higher total income.
For someone debating between claiming benefits at 67 (most people's full retirement age) or waiting until 70, the magic number is 82 ½. That's your break-even age: the earliest point when claiming at 70 is advantageous to claiming at 67.
Use your break-even age as one part of the decision making
Knowing this break-even age, it's your job to assess your personal situation to help determine if delaying benefits is worth it.
For someone with a personal or family history of health concerns, claiming earlier may be the wise choice to maximize benefits. For someone with a higher life expectancy who can comfortably live off their retirement savings for a few years, delaying benefits to increase the monthly payout makes sense.
Everybody's situation is unique, so carefully considering key factors, including your break-even age, is important. Make sure you weigh your current financial needs, retirement goals, and potential retirement income when doing your research.
Making an informed decision can not only put you in a better financial position, but it can also bring well-earned peace of mind during your retirement years.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (6549)
Related
- Trump has promised to ‘save TikTok’. What happens next is less clear
- Federal Data Reveals a Surprising Drop in Renewable Power in 2023, as Slow Winds and Drought Took a Toll
- 2 men convicted of killing Run-DMC’s Jam Master Jay, nearly 22 years after rap star’s death
- 2024 NFL draft: USC's Caleb Williams leads top 5 quarterback prospect list
- US Diplomats Notch a Win on Climate Super Pollutants With Help From the Private Sector
- Caitlin Clark 51 points from Pete Maravich's record as Iowa hits road against Minnesota
- Tuition will be free at a New York City medical school thanks to a $1 billion gift
- Suspect in New York hotel killing remains in custody without bond in Arizona stabbings
- American arrested in death of another American at luxury hotel in Ireland
- Your map to this year's Oscar nominees for best International Feature Film
Ranking
- Police cruiser strikes and kills a bicyclist pulling a trailer in Vermont
- Peter Morgan, lead singer of reggae siblings act Morgan Heritage, dies at 46
- Bronze pieces from MLK memorial in Denver recovered after being sold for scrap
- Mad Men Actor Eddie Driscoll Dead at 60
- Singles' Day vs. Black Friday: Which Has the Best Deals for Smart Shoppers?
- Bill filed in Kentucky House would ease near-total abortion ban by adding rape and incest exceptions
- Suspect in New York hotel killing remains in custody without bond in Arizona stabbings
- Federal judge reverses himself, rules that California’s ban on billy clubs is unconstitutional
Recommendation
-
King Charles III celebrates 76th birthday amid cancer battle, opens food hubs
-
Manhattan D.A. asks for narrowly tailored Trump gag order ahead of hush money trial
-
The 10 NFL draft prospects with most to prove at 2024 scouting combine
-
Smartphone ailing? Here's how to check your battery's health
-
'SNL' stars jokingly declare support for Trump, Dana Carvey plays Elon Musk
-
President Joe Biden makes surprise appearance on 'Late Night with Seth Meyers' for show's 10th anniversary
-
New York Democrats propose new congressional lines after rejecting bipartisan commission boundaries
-
Effort to protect whales now includes public alert system in the Pacific Northwest